Barticles Home Page

RSS 2.0



Bill O’Reilly, White Supremacist
Bart Hinkle
June 04, 2007 9:31 AM

Fox’s favorite browbeater, Bill O’Reilly, signs on to Pat Buchanan’s white-supremacist agenda: Protecting Christian white males from the dark heathen hordes:

O’REILLY: But do you understand what the New York Times wants, and the far-left want? They want to break down the white, Christian, male power structure, which you’re a part, and so am I, and they want to bring in millions of foreign nationals to basically break down the structure that we have. In that regard, Pat Buchanan is right. So I say you’ve got to cap with a number.

Never mind the gaping hole in the border—what about the gaping hole in the logic? Most of the foreign nationals coming to the U.S., after all, are Latinos with deep Christian faith. (Heck, I bet some of them even support the patriarchy!)


Reader Comments:

http://www.comegames.com

Posted by okxiaonan on 06/09 at 01:35 AM

Why should I argue when so many are willing to make my point for me?

Posted by R.Smith on 06/05 at 11:09 PM

Bill is #1 in ratings!

Dan Rather is a lier and news fabricator, yet he is heralded on every major news station except fox.

I know who I trust most.

If its considered normal for african americans to try and gain power through the congressional black caucus or the NAACP.
Then why is it abnormal for Caucasion,Christian males to try and hold onto the power they now have?

Desegregation only means that whites dont have the right to assemble in this country, while blacks continue to segregate themselves further as long as its benficial to them.

Same double standard that divides this nation into many imbued segments.

Posted by Rick on 06/05 at 10:56 PM

Billy Boy, Oh Boy, not only are you the most selfish/self absorbed individual on television/face of the planet, but it appears that you have some serious inferiority issues when it comes to you and your greedy fat white “Christian” buddies control of the power structure in America… come one man I dare you to give a Bolivian or Salvadorian a shot at running the show… whats the worst that could happen?

Posted by AdamandJeremy on 06/05 at 07:11 PM

O’ Reilly, Buchanan, and all the other hot-headed Leprechauns are far removed from the white power establishment they seek to defend. Why, only a century ago their own Irish Catholic ancestors were discriminated against by the WASP establishment.

So what’s the deal with these guys? Can anybody say Dissociative Personality Disorder?

Posted by Larry Lanberg on 06/05 at 01:37 AM

I have no intelletual pretensions and only a GED education, but I can say with certainty and without hesitation that O’Reilly IS a racist and Fox and Limbaugh ARE as nutty as a fruitcake.

Posted by Margie on 06/05 at 01:01 AM

Women have been trying to crash through the white, christian,male power structure for a long time now, to do a little sharing. Success has been minimal. Doubt if anything can threaten that combination, because it is wealth that bestows power, far more so than votes or population figures. That is entrenched and solid. White, Christian males have little to fear.

The only sinister motivation I see is a constant source of cheap labor.

Posted by Margie on 06/05 at 12:55 AM

I guess I could agree if I were that shallow but…

Mr O’Reilly appears to be speaking of the motivation behind certain establishments that support illegal immigration. One would have to be willfully stupid not to admit that what he is saying is true. There is a mindset among certain radicals that white people must be punished for past transgresions. That’s how we get the “White Privilage” conference at Seattles public schools and BTW, what was the NYT’s position on the Duke lacrosse players?

Uh huh….

And after you look that up, take a walk through the TD’s own archives. I seem to remember a column by Michael Paul Williams, written a few years back, about the changing demograpics of America and how white people were going to be in the minority by 2150. You could almost taste the glee. The implications, especially coming from someone who is mentally crippled by his obsession with race, were clear.

Having said that, I personally don’t like O’Reilly, and I actually prefer illegal Mexicans to most of my own countrymen simply because they’re not such self obsessed, domesticated brats. I would gladly support a swapping policy. They send us normal people and we send them our spoiled,naval gazing narcissists. Illegals are the people we used to be, and I wish them all the luck in the world.

But, to call O’Reilly a racist because he stated the obvious is lazy and simplistic although, predictable. To be a real bonifide intellectual, one is required to make snarky remarks about Fox News as well as Limbaugh ect.

Posted by R.Smith on 06/05 at 12:26 AM

My father’s father came to the U.S. from some little Baltic, hole-in-the-wall called Estonia. Yeah, his reason for coming here was to toss-out all non-Estonians from the U.S. govt (100% of the government, at that time). His burning desires included changing the official language of the U.S. to—you guessed it—Estonian—and yanking-down Old Glory from all of the post offices, burning the buildings afterward. His motives were sinister. LOOK! Just look at the awful mess this country is now in, directly a result of his settling here.

And now…the evil motives O’Reilly’s Irish Catholic brethren had for coming here…

Posted by Larry Lanberg on 06/04 at 03:33 PM

Well, now. I never imagined that illegal immigration would have such a good side-effect. Maybe I was hasty in opposing it.

Posted by Margie on 06/04 at 03:32 PM

Page 1 of 1 pages

Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email Address:

Location:

URL:

Your Comments:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement