inRich.com   


Keyword Search Site Web    Yahoo!

Barticles Blog
 

Barticles Home Page

RSS 2.0



Billboards Are Free Speech, Too
Bart Hinkle
May 08, 2008 9:07 AM

No matter what Vermont says.


Reader Comments:

Someone needs to do something about the illegal billboard on Mayo Island. Its detrimental to the whole idea that the James River is the crown jewel of the City

Posted by on 05/11 at 10:32 AM

Places that have restricted or regulated billboards look much cleaner and nicer (to me).

I don’t object to billboards along the inner Richmond corridors though simply because those areas are not terribly pleasant or pretty to begin with, so what’s the harm.

This is the same issue as putting up a titty bar in the old Julians.

Kids could cross the street from the Children’s Museum to continue their education, but aside from that, not a plus for Richmond.

However, Club Velvet, tucked away in a corner of Shockoe Slip, less of an eyesore or a canker. (maybe)

The idea behind regulation and restriction is not to curb free speech. There is no point to an ad anyway except to sell. Completely outside of the traditional concept of what free speech is about.

Those regulations insure you do have billboards on I-95 but you don’t have them on Monument Ave. or next to the state capitol.

As it should be.

Posted by Ed on 05/09 at 09:14 AM

“Pedro says...you’re always a WEINER at

SOUTH of the BORDER..

you never SAUSAGE a place!”

Now…

How the hell can that NOT be art?

Posted by R.Smith on 05/08 at 10:39 PM

What is on the billboard ,even commercial speech, is most likely protected speech.
The Billboard itself,its size and location might be legitimate targets of regulation through zoning and other legitimate intrests of the state.
The picture with the article showed a rural building. If it is on private property, it sounds as if the property owner should decide.
Of course, I am biased against billboards nor am I a lawyer.

Posted by on 05/08 at 04:01 PM

Vermont: “Bellows Falls, which after years of neglect is trying to rebound as an artist’s village.” Does this mean painting signs on City of Richmond buildings will cause it to rebound? Or does Monroe leaving mean it will rebound to #1 Murder City USA?

Posted by Artiste' on 05/08 at 03:05 PM

Free speech is whatever I agree with. Anything else is harrassment, porno, hate speech or an eye sore.

Down with oral pink eye!

We are never going to realize Utopia if we continue to allow people to do these things.

Now. Sit down. Shut up and DON’T TOUCH ANYTHING!

Posted by R.Smith on 05/08 at 11:09 AM

Ah yes, but it’s “commercial” speech, which has not received quite them treatment as individual or political speech.  I like the old-style signs painted on the sides of barns, though.  Much more attractive than the big steel-post billboards.

Posted by Bill on 05/08 at 10:31 AM

Page 1 of 1 pages

Post Your Comments:

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

--- advertising ---

 
 
 
 
 
 

News | Sports | Entertainment | Living | Shopping/Classifieds | Weather | Opinion | Obituaries | Services/Contact Us
© 2008, Media General Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions | Site Map
-- Part of the GatewayVa Network --
webmaster@inrich.com
A RealCities Network Site