“Its a little arrogant of Uno to assume how Biscuit or myself or anyone else feels.“

HA!  That’s pretty rich.  Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.  One does not have to travel too far back in the pages of Barticles to find clear examples of bob and biscuit engaging in the exact same activity towards R. Smith, Bart, me and anyone else who appears to be to the right of far left.

Oh boo-hoo, cry me some crocodile tears.  Mean ol’ right-wing neocon U’no is ascribing a particular viewpoint unfairly to poor ol’ bob and biscuit - that’s just not playing fair!  Forget that that is their stock-in-trade method of dealing with anyone they tag as “conservative”, “Republican” or “right-wing.“ 

Sheesh - talk about living in ideological boxes.  Congrats, bob - this might be the single most hypocrytical thing you’ve posted yet, and you managed it only only two sentences.

I guess i am the Biscuit echo chamber. Its a little arrogant of Uno to assume how Biscuit or myself or anyone else feels. But cons who live in ideological boxes tend to do this.
  I do not know much about the man except he defeated an arch-reactionaryby a few hundred votes.
  Given the election’s closeness, it would be natural for the Repos to want to reclaim the seat.

No offense Uno but allow the Biscuit to speak for himself.

I don’t even know who Parielo is, and I think equating cap and trade with national security is highly speculative.

Some might know enough to entertain an opinion on that. I think the Reps are going to target anyone and everyone they think is weak, just as the Dems did before that.

I don’t know if Waxman-Markey is worthy of targeting and special attention, but I do know Big Oil has way more than enough cash to support any cause they wish.

An outright lie: “"I can deal with losing reelection. I can’t deal with being a coward.“ Except for Bob and Biscuit, does anyone here think that Perielo really believes this? He says it is a national security issue. Then immplys that we must forceably be weaned off oil. Oh hum!