Libertarianism with a focus on law enforcement
Great snark from the left
Lefty e-zine with stuff you won't find anywhere else
Serious policy analysis with a Virginia focus
News and inventions of the geeky and offbeat kind
Free-market economics without all those equations
Libertarian think-tank musings
Brit lit and polit
Foreign affairs stuff
Needs no introduction
The master of the craft (with exclams!)
Intelligent liberalism
Really intelligent liberalism
The voice of Fairfax business
Libertarian principles, conservative politics
Cheerleading for the Democratic Party
A daily fix for political junkies
The voice of Reason (magazine)
Lengthy rebuttals to the Times-Dispatch opinion section
Strictly Richmond stuff
Red meat for conservatives
A view from Virginia's right
Observations and occasional art from the Fan District
Red meat for liberals
Liberal policy blog
Technocentric conservatism
More liberal wonkishness
Pro-conservative, anti-theocrat
A compendium of local leftishness
Where to go to read the rest
A nice Democratic lady
Good stuff from Charlottesville. Plus dogs!
Policyblogging from the center-left
Is conservatism
(a) Agreeing with anything President Bush says, or
(b) Upholding eternal verities and practices that have proven their worth over time?
Too many these days seem to think the answer is (a). It ain’t. And if the answer is (b), then the ACLU is not out of bounds to call itself in a recent ad “the most conservative organization in America” for opposing the Military Commissions Act of 2006.
That act, so eagerly sought by the Bush administration, weakens the constitutional guarantee of habeas corpus—a right whose recognition in common law goes back to before the Magna Carta of 1215. The ease with which some Republicans have been willing to cast aside almost eight centuries of legal tradition can be called many things, but it cannot be called “conservative.“
Comments (4)